|
Private and Confidential,
Lahore
June 2lst, 1937
My dear Mr. Jinnah,
Thank you so much for your letter which I received yesterday. I know yan are a busy man;
but I do hope you won't mind my writing to you so often, as you are the only Muslim in India
today to Whom the community has a right to look up for safe guidance through the storm which
is coming to North-West India, and perhaps to the Whole of India. I tell you that we are
actually living in a state of civil war which, but for the police and military, would, become
universal in no time. During the last few months there has been a series of Hindu-Muslim
riots In India. In North-West India alone there have been at least three riots during the
last three months and at least four cases of vilification of the Prophet by Hindus and Sikhs.
In each of the four cases the vilifier has been murdered. There have also been cases of
burning of the Quran in Sind. I have carefully studied the whole situation and believe that
the real cause of these event is neither religious nor economic. It is purely political, i.e.,
the desire of the Sikhs and Hindus to intermediate Muslims even in the Muslim majority provinces.
And the new constitution is such that even in the Muslim majority provinces, the Muslims are
made entirely dependent on non-Muslims. The result is that the Muslim Ministry can take no
proper action and are even driven to do injustice to Muslims partly to please those on whom
they depend and partly to show that they are absolutely impartial. Thus it is clear that we
have our specific reasons to reject this constitution. It seems to me that the new constitution
is devised only to placate the Hindus. In the Hindu majority provinces, the Hindus have of
course absolute majorities, and can ignore Muslims, altogether. In Muslim majority provinces,
the Muslims are made entirely dependent on Hindus. I have no doubt in my mind that this
constitution is calculated to do infinite harm to the Indian Muslims. Apart from this it
is no solution of the economic problem which is so acute among Muslims. The only thing that
the communal award grants to Muslims is the recognition of their political existence in India.
But such a recognition granted to a people whom this constitution does not and cannot help in
solving their problem of poverty can be of no value to them. The Congress President has denied
the political existence of Muslims in no unmistakable terms. The other Hindu political body, i.e.,
the Mahasabha, whom I regard as the real representative of the masses of the Hindus, has declared
more than once that a united Hindu-Muslim nation is impossible in India. In these circumstances
it is obvious that the only way to a peaceful India is redistribution of the country on the
lines of racial, religious and linguistic affinities. Many British statesmen also realise this,
and the Hindu-Muslim riots which are rapidly coming in the wake of this constitution are sure
further to open their eyes to the real situation in the country. I remember Lord Lothain told
me before I left England that my scheme as the only possible solution of the troubles of India,
but that it would take 25 years to come. Some Muslims in the Punjab are already suggesting
the holding of a North-West Indian Muslim Conference, and the idea is rapidly spreading. I
agree with you, however, that our community is not yet sufficiently organised and disciplined
and perhaps the time for holding such a conference is not yet ripe. But I feel that it would
be highly advisable for you to indicate in your address at least the line of action that the
Muslims of North-West India would be finally driven to take.
To my mind the new constitution with its ides o a single Indian federation is completely
hopeless. A separate federation of Muslim provinces reformed on the lines I have suggested
above, is the only course by which we can secure a peaceful India and save Muslims from the
domination of non-Muslims. Why should not the Muslims of North-West India and Bengal be
considered as nation entitled to Self-determination just as other nation as in India and
outside India are?
Personally I think that the Muslims of North-West India and Bengal ought are present
to ignore Muslim minority provinces. This is th best course to adopt in the interest of
both Muslim majority and minority provinces It will therefore be better to hold the coming
session of the League in the Punjab, and not in a Muslim minority province. The monhth of
August is bad in, Lahore. I think you should seriously consider the advisability of holding
the coming session at Lahore in the middle of October when the weather is quite good in
Lahore. The interest in the All-India Muslim League is rapidly growing in the Punjab, and
the holding of the coming session in Lahore is likely to give a fresh political awakening
to the Punjab Muslims.
Yours sincerely,
(Sd.) Mohammad Iqbal
Bar-at-Law
|